Glyphic (Inscriptional) Serif vs Optima
Optima was influenced by Glyphic (Inscriptional) Serif — its flared, tapering stems derive from chiselled inscriptional letters.
Glyphic (Inscriptional) Serif
Type that recalls letters chiselled in stone rather than written with a pen. Triangular, flaring serifs and a carved, monumental quality root it in the Roman inscriptional capital.
- Small, triangular, flaring serifs (incised, not slab)
- Moderate contrast with tapering stroke ends
- Carved, lapidary quality recalling stone-cut letters
- Classical Roman capital proportions
- Often capital-only, with minimal or no lowercase
Optima
Hermann Zapf's 1958 'serifless roman' — a humanist sans whose stems gently flare toward their ends, splitting the difference between sans and serif. Inspired by lettering Zapf sketched on Florentine grave slabs.
- Serifless stems that flare gently at the terminals
- Tapered 'waisted' strokes with modulated, swelling contrast
- Classical Roman capital proportions of varied width
- Calligraphic stress recalling chiselled inscriptional letters
- No bracketed serifs, yet clear thick/thin modulation
At a glance
| Glyphic (Inscriptional) Serif | Optima | |
|---|---|---|
| Era | Roman antiquity; revived 1900s–present | 1958 |
| Discipline | Typography | Typography |
| Region | Ancient Rome, Europe, United States | Germany |
| Family | Serif | Humanist Sans, Glyphic |
| Formal traits | glyphic, incised, flared-terminal, low-contrast | flared-stems, modulated-contrast, calligraphic, serifless |
More comparisons
Advertisement